Supreme Court examples of citations

The Court’s ruling today means that those deportations violated the Due Process Clause’s most fundamental protections. See ante, at 3 (reiterating that notice and an opportunity for a hearing are required before a deportation under the Alien Enemies Act).

— Justice Sotomayor (dissenting) in TRUMP v. J.G.G.
Under that doctrine as it existed in 1946, a judgment is “on the merits” if the underlying decision “actually passes directly on the substance of a particular claim before the court.” Id., at 501–502 (cleaned up).

— Justice Thomas in BROWNBACK v. KING
— signaling that he has changed a quote to improve readability without altering its meaning
Thompson did not argue that his alleged statement about “home improvement” was a true statement. See also Tr. of Oral Arg. 28 (“That is a false statement.”).

— Chief Justice Roberts in THOMPSON v. UNITED STATES
— showing that one period ends the quoted sentence and another ends the citation sentence
Other decisions of this Court indicate that the pardon power also falls in this category, see United States v. Klein, 13 Wall. 128, 147 (1872) (“To the executive alone is intrusted the power of pardon; and it is granted without limit”), as does the power to recognize foreign countries, see Zivotofsky v. Kerry, 576 U. S. 1, 32 (2015) (holding that the President has “exclusive power . . . to control recognition determinations”).

— Justice Sotomayor (dissenting) in TRUMP v. UNITED STATES

The Court’s ruling today means that those deportations violated the Due Process Clause’s most fundamental protections. See ante, at 3 (reiterating that notice and an opportunity for a hearing are required before a deportation under the Alien Enemies Act).

Under that doctrine as it existed in 1946, a judgment is “on the merits” if the underlying decision “actually passes directly on the substance of a particular claim before the court.” Id., at 501–502 (cleaned up).